Seems a little odd there’s been so much violence in these similar types of situations. I’m not so sure they are just random isolated incidents from asocial people. Perhaps there is a real agenda here to tighten gun control laws and remove guns from the public.
I like to analyze everything before I speak, so this isn’t without research. In the past year, the media has took isolated incidents to make the local police forces look incompetent. In some cases, there were legitimate tragedies. You don’t continue to choke someone where you hear them say “I can’t breathe”. In most cases, the police were doing their job and dealing with people who were not the best of citizens. You must look at everything on a case-by-case basis and not generalize. In all professions, you get nuts. There are going to be policemen on power trips who are racist. That doesn’t mean all policemen are, and the majority are very honorable men and women who serve and protect this country.
If you look at Nazi Germany, this is very similar to what happened then. Michael Savage, a radio talk show host, showed the parallels between what’s going on in the United States now and what happened back then. It seems like they want to insert a national police force next.
This is from a book I read:
The New World Order will include changes in:
The family: homosexual marriages will be legalized; parents will not be allowed to raise their children (the state will); all women will be employed by the state and not allowed to be “homemakers”; divorce will become exceedingly easy and monogymous marriage will be slowly phased out.
The workplace: the government will become the owner of all of the factors of production; the private ownership of property will be outlawed.
Religion: religion will be outlawed and believers will be either eliminated or imprisoned; there will be a new religion: the worship of man and his mind; all will believe in the new religion.
How would you insert all of this?
Well, family seems to be taken care of. The concept of monogymous relationships is already destroyed at this point with the divorce rate so high and people constantly searching for new sex partners. Whether right or wrong, homosexual marriage was legalized. I also heard a video clip from Aaron Russo who explained how Rockefeller told him that the women’s rights movement was created as a means to get them into the workplace. Why? Well, where do children learn principles and values? The home! Parents are the best teachers. That means that the less time that’s spent in the home, the only place these kids will gain a real base of knowledge is at school. Therefore, the state has control over what curriculum they learn. It’s quite interesting that the workforce now consists of 47%, yet, women are much better caretakers than men. Women are biologically programmed to have more compassion and they produce higher amounts of oxytocin to connect to their child.
In terms of the workplace, it is becoming exceedingly harder to make it in the private sector. Small business owners are having a harder time than ever, being taxed so heavily and fighting mega corporations, that it is almost impossible to gain any bit of ground. Anyone who wants to create in this world that doesn’t want to work for an existing corporation or the public sector is “rogue” at that point. You’re a threat. That’s why you are going to get chopped down in terms of a progressive tax rate. You are a legitimate threat to the elitists’ wealth and now you get people who want to redistribute wealth even more so, such as this Bernie Sanders. So let’s change it from 60% taxes to 80%? Oh yeah, that’s fair. It’s funny how these celebrities support this guy. If it was truly about helping people and they were so righteous, they would give 80% of their salary to charity right now. What is stopping them? They need some guy in the office to do it for them? Because their agenda is NOT necessarily about helping the poor!
Sidenote: You don’t help the poor by feeding them a fish. They’ll remain in a state of dependence for life. You help them by teaching them how to fish, which none of these celebrities will ever do outside of a rare few such as someone I look up to, Tony Robbins.
In terms of religion, we can see some fundamental changes. I’m all for believing in man and his mind, but I’m also going to believe heavily in G-d. There is no religion I would ever prescribe to that believes in killing in the name of G-d, and I hope you don’t either. What do you do with pure evil? What do you do with asocial people? You cannot treat them like social creatures. They aren’t. If someone’s going to attack your wife without thinking twice about it, you better be prepared to crush that guy’s windpipe. You can call for help to save his life, only after you fully disarm him because he’s not going to follow the rules of engagement. I’m all for being the bigger person and you must act better than the unrighteous, but you better protect what G-d produced as well. Evil exists because good men fail to act. If I was afraid to speak my mind, I’d stand idly by. Intelligent people who want to speak their mind are made to look like insensitive bastards if they offend someone in their statements. However, I know that MANY people agree with what I’m saying here.
The current man in the White House has a very tough time admitting that there are Islamic Extremists to be worried about and that is very, very concerning. Yes, there are extremists in all religions, but as the British Prime Minister said, why are the extremists who are causing the most terror coming out of one region and one religion? I know many people who are Islamic or Muslim who are great people and I am also almost positive that it doesn’t say to kill anywhere in the Quran. It’s just odd that the percentage of people willing to kill and die for that particular religion are so much higher, and nothing is being done to wipe out ISIS.
There are very few things that rock your stability in life. Losing a career or a loved one are the obvious ones, but distrust in your own government will certainly do it as well. I’m not certain here on the gun shootings being plotted out by an elitist group. I have to do more digging, but there’s enough dirt I’ve seen to be highly concerned.
From my research, it seems that the government was complicit in the Pearl Harbor attacks as an opportunity to go to war. I’m not here to say that 9/11 was a plot created by the government, but it wouldn’t surprise me if they were complicit, knowing it was going to take place and allowing it to happen as an opportunity to go to war. People and organizations have agendas and they might not be what’s best for the constituents or morally right. Anytime a government is willing to allow 3,000 people to die on U.S. soil, (regardless if it’s doing so out of their belief of the greater good), is not an entity I can ever fully trust.